From Newton, Einstein, Hawking to a new quantum philosophy/theologyalias Philosophy is NOT a servant of Theology ('filosofia ancella teologiae NON est' (2025)

Related papers

Theology Essay - Are faith and science compatible?

John E Horsfield

Theology Essay - Are faith and science compatible?

View PDFchevron_right

Review of Mathematics Through the Eyes of Faith

Joshua Wilkerson

View PDFchevron_right

The Relevance of God to Religious Believers and Non-Believers

Angela Leite

Religions, 2020

This study presents a review about what great figures of history thought about the existence of God and a worldwide comparison between religious believers and non-believers using the World Social Survey (WSS) database, comprising a sample of 90,350 respondents. Results reveal that most people believe in the existence of God and consider that God is important and very important in their lives. Believers are mainly women; younger than non-believers; mostly married; less educated than non-believers; most of whom work, though fewer hours than non-believers; and perceive themselves as belonging to the middle class. There are more believers with no formal education than non-believers. The diversity of religious believers and non-believers, visible in the perspectives of humanity’s important personalities, mirrors the diversity of ordinary people towards the relevance of God. The results obtained point to a correlation between the belief in God and the studied sociodemographic variables bu...

View PDFchevron_right

The origin of the world from science and religion perspectives

Alexandru Arion

Icoana Credintei

View PDFchevron_right

Theology and Science in Dialogue. Signposts and Perspectives

Ion Croitoru

2020

One can note that science tends to turn man into a master of the external and material, yet at the cost of turning him, on the level of his inner and spiritual life, into a slave of instincts altered by sin. All these, without a moral norm, become a power of destruction for man and represent issues addressed not just by bioethics, where the opinion of ‘theologians’ is consulted as well, but especially by the Church and by the Orthodoxy. The pressure of events imposes the issue of the recognition or, according to some, reformulation of the bases of ethics. Yet, this ethics ought to be constrained to a revision founded neither just on the progress of science, whose truths are partial, nor on the principles of rationalist or positivist philosophy, which try to convince man that he is no different from all the other living beings and needs to be treated in the same way as them, but on the reality of the religious fact, and, moreover, on the evidence of God’s Revelation and, implicitly, ...

View PDFchevron_right

Why Science Does Not Disprove G - Amir Aczel

JaKe Cook

View PDFchevron_right

The Fact of Creation and the Limits of Scientific Knowledge

Ion Croitoru

International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on the Dialogue between Sciences & Arts, Religion & Education, 2020

Although scientific research is in full bloom regarding, for instance, the environment, the fact of creation cannot be ignored either, even if some scientists deny it, while others ascertain it, albeit from perspectives, however, foreign to the patristic vision specific of the Orthodoxy. Consequently, the limits of cosmology are structured as well by Christian theology, which shows that the study of the world, guided by laws of physics in a limited framework, is carried out inside the creation affected by the consequences of the primordial sin, so that the reality of the world before sin is known only to those who reach spiritual perfection and holiness, therefore, from an eschatological perspective, since they, too, go through the moment of separation of the soul from the body, waiting for the general resurrection. Therefore, a new way of being is affirmed in the Orthodox Church, by the personal experience of each believer, which is a transformation on the personal and cosmic level...

View PDFchevron_right

Science and Religion: Moving Beyond the Conflict

Dr. Alexander F. van Biezen

This paper is based on my lecture at Christ Church, University of Oxford, on 30 November 2016 [Oxford Talks]: 'Science and Religion: Moving Beyond the Conflict' (https://talks-dev.oucs.ox.ac.uk/talks/id/70f6840a-a9fc-44f6-a919-f794230825c7/?format=txt ) Saying that science and religion are in conflict is knocking on an open door. Twenty-first century science does not disprove the existence of God, but it turns out that the universe does not need God for its existence. Religiously inspired explanations of reality are not refuted, but are slowly drifting into the shadows. Is there any place left for religion in a world without any need for the supernatural or the transcendent? How will traditional religions evolve in view of this new scientific image?

View PDFchevron_right

Science and Religion: Ten Models of War, Truce, and Partnership

Ted Peters

Theology and Science, 2017

This article updates previous articles: "Theology and Science: Where Are We?"

View PDFchevron_right

The relationship between science and religion. An introduction

Agustin Udias

Science and religion are the two grand visions of the world, so it is important to study their relationship. This relationship can be considered from the historical, philosophical and social point of view. The nature of science and technology on one side and of religion and religiosity on the other are briefly considered. After some preliminary considerations the difference between science and ideology is established. The relationship between science and religion is considered under five categories: conflict, independence, dialogue, complementariness and integration. Inevitable conflict is rejected on historical ground, although attitudes generating conflicts are present in the religious and scientific fundamentalisms. Independence assures the necessary autonomy of each one, but it is not sufficient. Dialogue is a good and desirable relationship that will enrich both of them. Complementariness adds to the dialogue that both visions of the world are not complete in themselves, so that they need to complement each other. Integration is a more problematic proposition and several approaches have been proposed. They can be grouped into those that go from the knowledge of nature to God and from a religious position to the knowledge of nature and science. As a conclusion a fruitful dialogue is proposed which recognizes the mutual autonomy between science and religion.

View PDFchevron_right

From Newton, Einstein, Hawking to a new quantum philosophy/theologyalias Philosophy is NOT a servant of Theology ('filosofia ancella teologiae NON est' (2025)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Maia Crooks Jr

Last Updated:

Views: 6093

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (63 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Maia Crooks Jr

Birthday: 1997-09-21

Address: 93119 Joseph Street, Peggyfurt, NC 11582

Phone: +2983088926881

Job: Principal Design Liaison

Hobby: Web surfing, Skiing, role-playing games, Sketching, Polo, Sewing, Genealogy

Introduction: My name is Maia Crooks Jr, I am a homely, joyous, shiny, successful, hilarious, thoughtful, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.